1. Banners
    Dismiss Notice

Wax:On September

Discussion in 'Going Out' started by Dan Wax:On, Aug 18, 2006.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

Page 4 of 4
  1. Hoss

    Hoss Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Im not talking shit, it is not uncommon or 'wrong' in any way to form an opinion of something based on personal experiences. For the umteenth time, the times i have been, i was dissapointed to see the headliners not there, which, no matter which way you put it, doesnt leave a good impression on the punters.

    I wouldnt whinge, i'd just stick to Shindig....
    Hoss, Sep 11, 2006
    #61
  2. MELT

    MELT Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    121
    Location:
    NEVER SLEEPS
    you make a fair point imo

    they just cant seem to accept that you have a bad experience of WAX:ON

    it doesnt matter if theyve had 109 acts on, if the 3 that you wanted to see werent on then anyone would be miffed
    MELT, Sep 11, 2006
    #62
  3. Hoss

    Hoss Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you!

    This is the point i've been trying to make all along.
    Hoss, Sep 11, 2006
    #63
  4. MELT

    MELT Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    121
    Location:
    NEVER SLEEPS
    for 1 of the individuals you only have to look at (a) where he now lives (b) his total post count (c) the time of day he posts to realise has very little life other than on here

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
    MELT, Sep 11, 2006
    #64
  5. Rossy

    Rossy . Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    7,916
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    Posts:456780000000000000000
    I think it's a given that you might be a bit dissapointed if you went to a night and the headline act cancelled every time, who denied that?

    Dan said that there were quite a few cancellations, which was then refuted by WaxOn. Jess said that Dan was wrong to which you replied that he wasn't and mentioned that everytime you've been to waxon (3 times) the headliners have cancelled, therefore it's a 100% rate of cancellation.

    As I said, in context of the argument, that is completely irrelevant as there have been numerous other Wax Ons inwhich the headliners have played as expected so you can hardly use that point to back up the argument (that WaxOn have had a lot of cancellations, which has been completely exaggerated based on peoples experience). You were just unluckly.

    Thankyou and goodnight.
    Rossy, Sep 11, 2006
    #65
Page 4 of 4

Share This Page