Surely the government has to start listening now....

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Ness, Jul 25, 2007.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

  1. ManofScience

    ManofScience Guest

    mines the other point of view - if these drugs are bad for you - why aren't alcohol and tabacco banned? if they were serious about the physical and mental health problem - they'd do it. Look at how they're blaming failing hospitals because of the number of cases in A&E of drunk people causing argo, assaulting doctors, wasting time etc.

    it's all down to the individual taking the drug - some people can take it, some just can't handle it and can have mental health issues - be it weed OR alcohol

    ness is right (some of the time ;) ) - it's about moderation - something that people of today seem to have forgotten sometimes
  2. Þ€tè®*

    Þ€tè®* Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yeah it is about moderation, and maybe the government are hypocrites at time, but noone can possibly say that legalising other drugs is a step forward, apart from a stoner ofcourse as they'll be able to get hold of stuff easier lol.

    Like i said i chose to do drugs when clubbing, i knew they were illegal and could possibly harm me, but that was my choice, if they were easier to get hold of i think alot of people would try them that maybe doesn't know the risk and could do damage to themseves.
  3. claire

    claire Beautifully Bad

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Leamington Spa
    If alcohol and tobacco had been discovered in the past 40 years they would almost certainly be banned now like some of the recreational drugs, many of which are less damaging. But because of the long history of use they are pretty much part of modern life, regardless of the damage they can cause. All you have to do to see the huge uproar banning them now would cause is look back at attempts of prohibition in the USA and the problems that caused and the controversy surrounding the new smoking laws here.

    Very true, just look at the Dutch thinking about taking action against English in Amsterdam because of their behaviour, despite the Dutch making huge profits from the English visiting the area
  4. ManofScience

    ManofScience Guest

    it would be interesting to speculate WHY attitudes towards going out and enjoying a night out of whatever drug you take, has become so 'severe' - the rise of the binge drinking culture

    it seems to be hiting certain parts of america with all the uproar about 'spring break' and that place in mexico they all go to get hammered. 'tijuana' is it? sounds like whitley bay :p



    i think the smoking laws came in quiet easy - people moaned more than anything else before it actually happpened and it's taken a little getting used to (i've been drinking twice since it happened :lol: and not ina club yet!) - so maybe modern prohibition laws would be accepted easier.

    Personally. i'd chuffing move abroad.
  5. forks

    forks still not dead

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    142
    Location:
    hurtling towards nirvana
    @pete - thats a classic response - I did it, and now I don't, but I'm sure the rest of youse couldn't handle it so you should be barred from making the decision.

    @MoS - I agree logic dictates that all is legal or all is banned but I would hate my fellow citizens to feel they have the right to stop me having a drink if I want. There are laws in place to deal with me if I get drunk and disorderly.

    @MistaK - you can't have that name and advocate the banning of drugs and expect to be taken seriously :lol:

    At heart this is a debate about civil liberties. Some harm would be caused if drugs were available to consenting adults, but much more harm is caused by the present system. The jails are full of people who did nothing to harm anyone else, organised crime is strengthened, people are taking adulterated drugs, safe use is compromised in clubs because they have to pretend no one is doing them, gun crime is increased and so on. But it's not really about harm reduction. Adults should be free to do what they want if it only causes hurt to themselves. That goes for anything from rock climbing to drug taking to tatooing a full english breakfast on their head.
  6. Chewy

    Chewy I'd fist it

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    118
    Location:
    The Bronx
    if you legalise drugs and let the governemt control them, it will do nothing, they will just cost more because of tax and we will still have dealers selling them at a cheaper price

    edit:- should have read all the posts first
  7. forks

    forks still not dead

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    142
    Location:
    hurtling towards nirvana
    theres not much moonshine or home grown tobacco on sale though, even if they are both taxed heavily ?
    I did know a lad who made his own alcohol with his own still but you wouldn't want to drink that all night :spangled:
  8. Chewy

    Chewy I'd fist it

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    3,292
    Likes Received:
    118
    Location:
    The Bronx
    yeah but there are plenty of illegal drugs kicking about, so therefore plenty of people are making them and why would they stop as they are obviously making loads from it
  9. Þ€tè®*

    Þ€tè®* Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,756
    Likes Received:
    3
    Well done for making a complete arse of yourself, the drugs were illegal when i done them, and still are illegal, therefor i was barred from making the decision myself, but still found drugs through a dealer therefor people who really want to get into them can do the same.
  10. Rossy

    Rossy . Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    7,916
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    Posts:456780000000000000000
    SSRI's are undoubtably more damaging than a lot of illegal drugs on the market. They are more actively damaging to your serotonin receptors and handed out like sweets by the NHS (people with social anxiety getting prescribed SSRI's???). These really can fuck with your seratonin reuptake permanently. The difference being that people have been permanantly fucked by their doctors. Doctors inability to prescribe people effective treatment is another story alltogether though.

    F.Y.I

    Effexor, Paxil, mirtazapine ARE more damaging than LSD, mushrooms, 2C-B etc

    What people seem to forget is that there are saturation points, and you can easily do drugs (specific ones in particular) fairly often with no negative impact on your personality, memory or general functioning.

    I can't believe that people on here believe drugs should actually be illegal. How can people possibly agree that oppressive people with absolutely no experience of drugs or the good people that use them themselves can restrict your freedoms and imprison you for a personal choice.

    This is not about saving people (talk to frank hands out LETHAL advice and has practically no harm reduction worth whatsoever) it's about peoples freedoms and other people being allowed to restrict them. Why the fuck shouldn't I be allowed to do whatever chemical I see fit in the safest possible way without a threat of legal action?

    The idea that we would turn into a nation of zombies is laughable, people are already zombies, the same people that don't think outside the box and believe media propaganda without doing their own research, who work like drones for money that they do not spend and end up depressed because their lives are empty are vacant.

    Last weekend I had an experience that will put a smile on my face for months, I was wrecked to bits and loved every single minute of it - and I hold down a well paid job in a secure industry. I'm about as far from a robot as you can get, the people that are scared of peoples choice to explore and alter their experience are the ones that are getting locked into a monotone worthless existance, not me.
  11. Rossy

    Rossy . Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    7,916
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    Posts:456780000000000000000
    I can't believe that you are putting workforce productivity (more money for corporations, globalisation etc) over peoples personal freedoms.

    It's the equivalent of putting the extremely high earning toff wanker that owns my companys personal gain above my right to do whatever the fuck I want.

    Unbelievable.
  12. Rossy

    Rossy . Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    7,916
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    Posts:456780000000000000000
    All products of prohibation.

    Legalise heroin, allow farmers in third world countries to produce it legally (more money for their economy, better living there, more jobs), perform cheap synth in the UK = cheap heroin for anyone that wants to use it. Remove stigma associated with it, allow people to be able to keep their jobs and lead healthy lives on pharm grade heroin and regulate their doses correctly. Then they can get in and jack up all the like.
  13. Þ€tè®*

    Þ€tè®* Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,756
    Likes Received:
    3
    what a load of shite lol when i was getting sick of pills id only do them once every 5 months or so and i noticed a massive change each time, after i've done them my body weight decreses by shit loads through sweating it out, your eating pattern goes as does your sleeping pattern if you've been clubbing, and from a training point of view your general functioning goes right out the window cos i was unable to train anywhere near as hard. Also from a mental point of view when i took pills regularly my memory was shit, id forget stuff that was told to me 5 minutes before and even my speech was fucking up slightly.

    Yes maybe doing things in moderation might be safe but a vast majority of people who get into drugs like pills get hooked on them (not as an addiction before you correct me) but just the feeling and end up caning them for a bit.

    If people wanna get wrecked that's cool, but the thought of some drugs being made legal is laughable.

    :)
  14. forks

    forks still not dead

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    142
    Location:
    hurtling towards nirvana
    @ rossy totally agree mate
    @pete - the point is you stopped when you thought it was doing you no good. why do you imagine all the rest of us are too stupid to do the same?
    and you were barred from using the drugs but you chose to break the law. an action which could have seen you locked up for life if you had happened to give a mate a few pills. Is this the best way to organise things. surely you can't believe that.
  15. Rossy

    Rossy . Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    7,916
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    Posts:456780000000000000000
    No it isn't, the thought of people being imprisoned for victimless crimes is.

    You have always been a weird one (if you'll excuse my choice of words) when it comes to this, you'd have a spliff and say you couldn't think for days which I'm sure most people will agree isn't normal.

    I'm not exactly sure what you're calling a "load of shite" there. You CAN do certain drugs and experience no negative long term effects from them. You are reffering specifically to MDMA, which I'm not doubting has caused me memory "problems" (more mild inconviniences considering how fun it is). However I now use it more moderately and I'm absolutely fine. It's not as if I ever think "shit, I can't remember x thought" and that my years of fun are now causing me mass problems". You're also speaking in the past tense, as if things have improved for you. Obviously if you do mdma and dance all night you will lose weight through loss of water, which shouldn't really be a problem as it will up again once you drink more water? Likewise if you miss a meal it's not the end of the world.

    I've never really understood it, I've done more drugs more often than you and I'm absolutely fine. There was an article in the metro today from a doctor who was saying that the brain is like a muscle and if people don't use it, it will not funtion properly. No offence but you've worked as a waiter since you were about 16 and got through a music production course by copying work off all your mates and are still to show me your latest prog anthem. Maybe more than anything you're just being completely lazy? I went to the gym once then couldn't be bothered, hence I'm relatively unfit. My job requires me to try and get my mind round things all day long and I feel mentally stable and more intelligent than before I began doing drugs. You seem to be more into keeping your body healthy whereas I simply view that as a vehicle for my mind and would rather have interesting experiences. This paragraph is pretty much irrelevant for the conversation at hand everyone by the way, just more directed as a conversation between me and peter.

    I think that regardless of this, negative effects of drugs, which are usually only short term effects do not mean that GOOD people should be imprisoned. Someone camped next to us at glade was arrested for posession of 82 pills, he was absolutely sound and doing nothing any different from your friends sorting you pills in the past. He could now do time for possession of a fucking chemical and I feel so sorry for him, and think that anyone who condones that needs to have a good long think about it. If people are happy with this then good for you, personally I think it's shit.
  16. TheSpence

    TheSpence Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2002
    Messages:
    18,726
    Likes Received:
    112
    Always been a strange one this. I think the people who want them legal don't understand the consequences:

    1) Recreational drugs would be the easiest target for tax increases & with two budgets that would see then end of the £2 cowie!!!
    2)Quality of the stuff, yes sometimes you don't get off tits because of poor shit but do you think the Government will be knocking out high impact quality shit? It will be limited.
    3)Drug dealers will be targeted even more!!! Why. because they are now not only selling something they shouldn't, they will not be paying tax as well. So everyone will be in Boots buying there £20 pill or the £100 coke fix.

    KEEP THEM ILLEGAL!!! This method saves £££'s for the consumer.


    Please note I am not a drug user but with the rising debt levels in the UK the price of cheap drugs is all some fuckers can afford.
  17. Mr.B.ThatsMe

    Mr.B.ThatsMe 'yi raji puff

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    7,525
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Crawcrook
    I'm sure most people will agree that people who are in bad debt probably need to think about getting out of it, instead of off their tits :dunce:
  18. TheSpence

    TheSpence Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2002
    Messages:
    18,726
    Likes Received:
    112
    From reading the odd article it is 18 to 30 year olds that are increasing the unsecured debt mountain they don't need highly taxed drugs as well.
  19. ManofScience

    ManofScience Guest

    :lol: :lol: :lol: they call them drama queens rossy ;)

    sounds like you've had extreme reactions pete - i'm living proof pills don't make u thin and lose weight thru regular and moderate use
  20. forks

    forks still not dead

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,216
    Likes Received:
    142
    Location:
    hurtling towards nirvana
    if I knew what I was getting every time was of a consistant quality and legal I would gladly pay tax and pay more.
    the government wouldn't make it, it would be private firms. Tabs are a consistent strength, if they didn't work nobody would buy them.
    Dealers would be out of business. Thats a good thing IMO. the people at the top of the chain are utterly ruthless bastards who SHOULD be locked up. One of the sad consequences of the criminalisation of drugs is that all the users keep quiet cos they want to keep their supplier out of trouble and that protects the people at the top. It's only the little guys who are just getting a bit for their mates who get caught and locked up.
    Of the drugs out there MDMA is relatively benign and having it as class A just shows the ignorance of those in 'authority'
    If you totally cane anything from chocolate to pickled onions you will do yourself damage. The reason they are banned is to do with what phil mitchell said at first - they don't want the little drones taking time off and reducing productivity and creating more wealth for the rich. That would never do.

Share This Page