Plane Terror Plots

It's called Debunking 911 Debunking the clue is in the title

He's basically pulling apart everything the debunkers such as N.I.S.T. & Popular Mechanics put out to discredit any alternative theory other than that of the Official story.

how do you know that? passenger jets fly over washington all the time. I think we flew over it when we went to merica. Maybe they do that now (although I doubt it) but did they do that before 9/11?
where are these fighters how long do they take to scramble? how close are they to washington? how far away from Washington does an airliner travelling at 600 miles an hour have to be before the order to scramble is given? if it takes 10 minutes till they get in range that implies 100 miles away. Are all passenger jets within 100 miles shot down/ what if they crash on the city?
Dulles airport is only 10 miles from the pentagon. How does anybody get to land there?
it's rubbish

I asked you who has watched all of the films does he say it was plane or a missile is he DEBUUNKING C.Sheen

The flights in out of Dulles have it easy dodging the F16's think of the poor folk who fly in & out of Ronald Reagen Airport look how close it is to the Pentagon

Im talking about on the day on 9/11...
It was common knowledge that after the 2nd plane hit the WTC, all flights were stopped, anything found flying in/out of NY that day the Military had the order to scramble Jets & be taken out of the sky... however 'a plane' was able to fly into the Pentagon.

I can see the problem now, the military jets were in NYC while the Pentagon is in Washington DC.

- correction 'The Country'.


Edit: What did you think of the Debunking vids?

The unanswered questions from the movement in response to the Official Story that have been completely body swerved is absolutely astonishing. The evidence that there was more than just 2 planes involved in bringing down 3 steel structure buildings pertty much all at the same speed, all on the same day, for the 1st ever time in History is beyond compelling.

- Al Suqami's Passport found in near perfect condition at ground zero.
- Luggage with a copy of the Koran & Mohammed Attahs will seized at the Airport - Why would you carry a will in a suitcase that was about to be flew into a Sky Scraper building?
- No video evidence or substantial remains to what could ever be sold as a Plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
- Not a shred of evidence to explain where or what happened to flight 93, apart from a theory that the plane 'vaporised' due to heat after crashing.
- The steel that was shipped out of the Country the very next day to be melted down in China when this was crucial evidence to one of the most devastating crimes in History.
- The millions of dollars worth of 'Put Options' placed on the stock market days before 9/11 that were never ever investigated.
- Mobile telephone calls that were made at 40,000ft from planes which didn't hold such technology back in 2001.
- The FBI Most Wanted list (still to this day) does not state that Usama bin Laden is wanted in connection with the 9/11 attacks. When a member of the Movement called to ask why, the FBI's response was that they simply didn't have enough evidence to hold Bin Laden responsible.
- The BBC reporting WTC7 had collapsed due to fire 20 minutes before it had even fell.
- The 6 Arabs that were accused of the Terror Attacks & reported as dead turning up days later alive & well, having no connection to 9/11.

There is stuff FEMA, N.I.S.T & Popular Mechanics can explain - in great detial. For me (personally) theres just too many Smoking Guns to think that 19 Arab Hijackers were capable of all this alone.

Thats probs the biggest one in my eyes. The building is behind the reporter while she is telling us it has just collapsed

There was no visable damage to the building, apart from a few scattered fires & smashed windows. And then, when it fell it looked like one of the most expert demolishions in history!

are we supposed to deduce from that that the BBC reporter was working to a prepared script? ????? how did that come about? they sent her to the US with a script prepared beforehand? how many people would have to have been in on that for it to have been done?

- just think about this for a moment- you have conspired to bring down the world trade centre towers killing all the people in them and all the people in the airliners. in order to achieve what exactly?

-forget that for a moment --- you have told a major world news agency about it beforehand and they have agreed to go along with this and managed to convince their reporter to go along with it too. You have put them in New York at the right time with a pre-prepared script giving them the exact time that the towers will be blown up and they read it out disregarding the facts as the viewers can see the towers still standing.

wouldn't it have been safer and easier for you to have simply let the BBC report it all normally?
what do you gain by letting all these extra people in on the conspiracy?



OR the reporter cocked up in the heat of reporting such a major story and made a mistake? come on which is most likely?

This threads gettin on my nerves now

9/11 conspiracy theories do that

You've cherry picked one of the weaker events that occurred on 9/11 & tried to make everything else sound stupid.

Id be keen to hear your answers on everything else I put:

- Al Suqami's Passport found in near perfect condition at ground zero.
- Luggage with a copy of the Koran & Mohammed Attahs will seized at the Airport - Why would you carry a will in a suitcase that was about to be flew into a Sky Scraper building?
- No video evidence or substantial remains to what could ever be sold as a Plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
- Not a shred of evidence to explain where or what happened to flight 93, apart from a theory that the plane 'vaporised' due to heat after crashing.
- The steel that was shipped out of the Country the very next day to be melted down in China when this was crucial evidence to one of the most devastating crimes in History.
- The millions of dollars worth of 'Put Options' placed on the stock market days before 9/11 that were never ever investigated.
- Mobile telephone calls that were made at 40,000ft from planes which didn't hold such technology back in 2001.
- The FBI Most Wanted list (still to this day) does not state that Usama bin Laden is wanted in connection with the 9/11 attacks. When a member of the Movement called to ask why, the FBI's response was that they simply didn't have enough evidence to hold Bin Laden responsible.
- The BBC reporting WTC7 had collapsed due to fire 20 minutes before it had even fell.
- The 6 Arabs that were accused of the Terror Attacks & reported as dead turning up days later alive & well, having no connection to 9/11.

This is the bbc we are talking about though....

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWAvHnfJsOQ"]YouTube - BBC News interviews the wrong 'Guy'[/ame]

Osama bin Laden "To the American people, this is my message to you: a reminder of the reasons behind 9/11...." Likes this kid knows

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/14/osama-bin-laden-obama-message

To be fair he is the only person to feature on the FBI's ten most wanted & most wanted terrorists.

I think this sort of fairley sums up the reason why:
“The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”


Werent Ramzi Binalshibh and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed the main men in Al Queda who ran the 9/11 attack/scam?

I didn't cherry pick- I just asked the questions that anyone should ask when shown such non evidence as the BBC report. It's nonsense yet it's still routinely trotted out as evidence of a conspiracy.

I can't be bothered refuting all the other so called evidence. It's boring to keep going over the same old ground. Tell me which one do you think conclusively proves the conspiracy and I'll deal with that