Man-made global warming.... biggest myth of this century

Discussion in 'News & Current Affairs' started by Yosef Ha'Kohain, Mar 19, 2007.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

  1. BRID

    BRID Has name in red. Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    8,341
    Likes Received:
    218
    Location:
    Ever changing
    Theres a world of difference between releasing CO2 into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels ..... and destroying a local river by dumping toxic waste into it and killing all the wildlife in one fell swoop.
  2. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    The point I was trying to make was about quality of evidence - science is at its most devastatingly effective when you can observe, hypothesis, design an experiment to test, control the variables and see.

    You can't design an experiment for global warming (or evolution, or gravity) - you can show that in a model of the earth that carbon leads to raised temperatures, but how do you know it accurately reflects it, and you've not missed something crucial? You'd need 2 identical worlds and a way to introduce carbon externally to 1 to prove it.

    However, if carbon IS the cause, then we have a potential way of averting global warming -> the catastrophe some would have you believe.

    We have to decide at what point a convincing theory can be accepted in the face of imperfect evidence - possibly not because the theory is flawed, but beause the ways of testing that theory are flawed.
  3. BRID

    BRID Has name in red. Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    8,341
    Likes Received:
    218
    Location:
    Ever changing
    Taking the individual loss of life ASIDE ....

    ..... Whats so bad about global warming?

    We've had it before, we are due it again ..... why fight nature?
  4. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Think how much labour would have to raise taxes to pay for flood defenses, and how much extra your insurance premiums would be ;)
  5. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    I'm pretty sure you can.
  6. Guest

    It's the sun's fault.
  7. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can prove an effect exists that draws things towards the ground; I cannot prove that it is not due to the hand of god as some americans (I always assumed it was a wind-up but I've stopped making assumptions like that these days) would have you believe.

    It's the same with this - you can show that temperatures are rising, you can't prove it's due to carbon.
  8. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    You've got a real chip on your shoulder haven't you :lol:
  9. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    I couldn't think of a better example :oops:
  10. scruf

    scruf Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2002
    Messages:
    9,757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Islington, London
    Re: Man-made global warming.... biggest myth of this century

    Bjorn Cohen Ljomborg...
  11. Oasis

    Oasis Peter North-east

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    8,122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Seaham
    People get proper carried away by the all this global warming shite, just because we have a few freak weather disasters and a hot summer. There's points in the earths history that were the same, the worlds temperature fluctuates and it happens quite quickly, an ice age can occur over a few thousand years.

    The oil/gas isn't running out either, there's so much more out there to be drilled, don't panic! Fusion will be the power of the future anyway.

    we're talking years and years before owt bad could happen. If that's the way things go then so be it, maybe it's the fate of the human race. We'll die out and another species will evolve just like we did. Monkeys maybe:wink: :monkey:
  12. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Re: Re: Man-made global warming.... biggest myth of this century

    Lomberg even.
  13. B.O.B.

    B.O.B. Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,169
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    London
    :lol: The UK's supplies are in decline (we are already a net importer of gas and have been for the last few years), as they are in most of continental Europe. Only Norway is increasing its production at the moment with the Ormen Lange field starting production in October this year. There is gas and oil elsewhere, but it is becoming more and more expensive to extract as we are tapping more difficult fields, and there is no guarantee that the countries that have it will share anyway. It is a finite resource, and we should be careful with it. It's all very well to say that fusion will be the power of the future, but don't put too much belief in that until we know we can actually do it.
  14. BRID

    BRID Has name in red. Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    8,341
    Likes Received:
    218
    Location:
    Ever changing
    The thing is though - we have a current energy 'crisis' in everyones minds, but at the same time we have the means to produce massive amounts of low risk energy (nuclear), with new developments coming on board in the next 20 odd years or less.

    People say we are at 'peak oil' now which means production is going to get progressivelly lower and lower and you would think, if you believed the media - that we are all fucked.

    But - 20/30 years is a long time and whats to say that electric cars wont be the standard then, recycling wont be the norm (for plastics and oil related goods), and power will be generated by realistic, future proof means.

    We've already had companies like GM shelve electric car plans 20 years ago deliberately, and have a variety of renewable energy production means available to us ... but why dont we use them? Probably cause its cheaper to dig fuel out the ground.

    No doubt there'll be an increasing hoo-haa in the future, and oil prices will go up and down in massive swings ... but somehow i think in 100 years time people will look back and laugh about how we all cared so much about fossil fuels.
  15. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here's what 'they' said about nuclear power: "energy too cheap to meter".

    It would be a serious error to assume we will have a plentiful clean supply of energy in our lifetimes. It would be rather like smoking with the view that it doesn't matter because there'll be a cure for lung cancer by the time you get it.

    Conserving in the meantime costs little. In 50 years if they're wondering why we got so worked up about fossil fuels then fine. But if they don't have an alternate supply of energy, then they're fucked, and they'll probably wonder how on earth we justified our wastefulness and bemoan that we didn't listen to the conservationists.
  16. B.O.B.

    B.O.B. Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,169
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    London
    And how are we going to produce the energy to power these electric cars? At the moment it would be by burning fossil fuels!

    Yes, renewable energy is often more expensive, it is also often unpredictable (think wind and wave generation), takes up a lot of room (which pisses off the nimbys) etc etc. Nuclear generation is great, but there is only a limited amount of nuclear fuel too. It takes at least ten years from planning a nuclear station to it actually generating, not to mention the good old nimby issues.

    With the implementation of the Large Combustion Plant Directive next year, coal fired power stations without flue gas desulphurisation equipment will only be able to run a certain amount of hours per year, we closed two Magnox power stations on 31 December last year, with more nuclear to close in future, and we aren't building enough other power stations to make up the difference at the moment, meaning in the short to medium term there will be a shortage which will cause prices to rise. Hopefully this will encourage new electricity supplies as they will make more sense economically.

    So, energy efficiency is the key!
  17. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,868
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    andy that graph clearly shows as fuel consumption went up the temprature dipped... from 1940-1970.
  18. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,868
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    Re: Re: Man-made global warming.... biggest myth of this century

    ;)
  19. scruf

    scruf Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2002
    Messages:
    9,757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Islington, London
    Re: Re: Re: Man-made global warming.... biggest myth of this century

    Pedant.. I had the Sceptical Environmenalist next to me when I wrote that :oops:

    My take on it is the ice age - inter glacial thing is all fine and well, but how do you offer a plausible explanation for the almost concurrent correlation of rising global temperatures and rising emissions since roughly the begining of the industrial revolution?

    also Joe, I think I'm correct in saying that the conditions that increase temperatures have a significant lag time? so the temparture decreasing may have more to do with reduced fuel consumption / manufacturing from pre WW1 through the post war economic decline and great depression and into WW2 and so on, returning to its rational trajectory in the 50's..

    that almost makes sense if you fiddle with the chronology of the chart.. that aside assumption that this chart will provide an answer to the question is a fairly erroneous assumption as we've already noted fuel consumption is far from the only binding factor...
  20. scruf

    scruf Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2002
    Messages:
    9,757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Islington, London
    Think of ths next time you drink soya milk or any soya product presented as being 'eco friendly' or some kind of vegan feted alternative..

Share This Page