Just Sums Sunderland Up

Its the only thing you's will win

If only the nation new of Sunderland, most people still call yous Geordies

Kevin Kyle battering a waiter
Kilbane giving his own fans the finger
Reidy & the bucket of water chucked on him
The kids with guns shooting down the high street
Oster with gun blinding a fellow pro
Lenny rucking

People would laugh at yous but most people dont who yous are, we only know yas because we live near by.

If you tell yourself that enough times you may start to believe it, and all of those things put together are still nowhere near as hillarious as two of your players fighting with each other

We always win in Sunderland, have you ever seen us lose a game in Wearside?

All that money ands thats your claim to fame, pretty sad really

Strange as it is all true & you know it

you can believe that myth all u like it makes me laugh when u say it

Where better than your team will do me.

Which bit is not true?

If only the nation new of Sunderland, most people still call yous Geordies

Kevin Kyle battering a waiter
Kilbane giving his own fans the finger
Reidy & the bucket of water chucked on him
The kids with guns shooting down the high street
Oster with gun blinding a fellow pro
Lenny rucking

As you should be with the financial backing your club has had compared to ours, its not hard is it one club invests £300 billion pound in players one invests 13p, hmmmm wonder which one will be the best. the only funny thing is the one who has invested the least has won a major competition more recently

ok. so does that mean that boro are a better team than chelsea? after all, boro have invested less but won a major competition more recently...

my point is team who invest more money into there sides are going to be more succesful then teams that do not, both Boro and Newcastle have invested milions upon millions more than Sunderland hence why they are better than them, Chelsea have in turn invested more than Boro which is why they are more succesful then them, the only side that fucked it up on that theory are Leeds but every other club who invests heavily in there side are usually a hell of alot more succesful then ones that dont.

well thats what uv just said about sunderland and newcastle. you's have won a major competition more recently AND spent alot less, well done. doesnt mean your a better club.

was that confused smiley because iv just proven you wrong?

no i doubt it. it is possibly because chelsea have now won the league cup, hence winning something more recently than boro and totally negating your point.

Your embarrassing yourself,what yous won something in 1973 & we won something in 1969!!!! WOW 4 years difference if you go back 32 years, a time both of us were not even born. Our money has achieved 10 years in the prem, Champions League & few good cup runs & as we make profit most years it shows the investment hasn't been at cost, unlike the huge loans Sunderland took to stay in the Prem & pay big bucks to the Grays,Phillips etc

This is just painfully boring now & is turning into one of them debates as the reason people don't use the sports forum. Even Trickle has stopped posting because these things turn crap after about post 11.

Stop posting then

joke tickle has stopped posting because even he could not find a silk lining to the bowyer dyer mess. i was really looking forward to hear his opinions on the subject. (sad i know! )

I was gonna say, he has been a fucking big miss like

bastard could use more than a handfull of other clubs to be fair though. just cos a clubs won something more recently doesnt make them a better club. that all my point is