Global Warming

..apparently one those Dyson hand dryers saves 400KG of Carbon emissions a year compared to a normal hand dryer. Just makes you wonder, the extent to which we are pumin out CO2 into the atmosphere.
In conclusion global warming = bad

That graph indicates a 0.8 degree rise in 150 years.

The population is rising exponentially, as is our co2 emissions. You would also expect the temperature to rise in the same way. increasing more rapidly. it seems like a steady increase from that graph

toyota already are on top of the hydro . they have 250 hydro cars on a lease for 3 years , after that they can see any problems and crack on .

as for the second statement it would be a different story if all that did happen and you didnt have the life you had now .

wether its true or not that the end is neih , saying i dont give a fuck (im not saying you r mind ) is just the wrong attitude . changes dont happen over night , its not a case for 'jim'll fix it' , and everythings better . and if nothing happens 10 / 20 / 30 years time then perhaps we are wrong , but if something did happen then perhaps marty mcfly needs to go back in time with the doc and teach us the truth . perhaps he already has and bush paid him off

peace

thats why im not having kids , i should be paid from the goverment not to breed ( well , not in the fun kind of way)

also we can blame our grandads , and there dads and so forth back in 1750 when the industrail revolution started , mass coal powering factorys , trains , etc . from then on the snow ball effect got bigger ,

act now on c02 - peace and love the earth and what items grow in its soil ( especaily weed)

On one channel there was all this about global warming, flick over to sky news & it's about Iran, blasting rockets all over the place

God help us all eh

i think we should all do our bit cause every little effort counts - however, we the general public are often made/forced to pay for it, shamed into doing out 'little' bit by turning off lights, recycling yoghurt pots yet big industries and even larger developing countries pour out much more polution and waste.

my personal problem is packaging - the amount of new computers i've seen arriving in recent years and the HHUUGGEEE amount of useless extra unnecessary TAT that comes with it is ridiculous.

We as individuals can all do ours small bits but it's only a drop in the ocean

Totally agree m8, use to work with them my self n it use to piss me rite off getting things unboxed, probly took me longer to unbox a tower than it would to build/sort 1

TBH If i was your child Id have more important things on my mind than it being a few degrees warmer outside, having you for a dad would be my main cause for concern..

Just aswell im not ur dad then eh... & lay off the jimmy carr dvds ya fuckin tosser.

Co2 does not drive climate change - we're made of Co2, the notion is daft. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) use incomplete models of evidence to correlate heightened emissions to a warmer climate. They focus on too narrow a time frame.

http://www.aefweb.info/articles59.html

We're at the end of a solar cycle and there's plenty of peer reviewed climatology work that suggests the planet is actually cooling down. If this is the case, then it's evident that emisions aren't the sole factor dictating planetary warming.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle"]Solar cycle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Sunspot_10981_Solar_Cycle_24.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/Sunspot_10981_Solar_Cycle_24.jpg/250px-Sunspot_10981_Solar_Cycle_24.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/d/dc/Sunspot_10981_Solar_Cycle_24.jpg/250px-Sunspot_10981_Solar_Cycle_24.jpg[/ame]

Emisions may exarcebate factors sure, but when you consider parts of the Thames were frozen over a century ago and people were bricking themselves thinking an ice-age would be nigh - it all starts to look fishy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Thames_frost_fairs#The_last_frost_fair

There was also the medievil warm period where it was in excess of the projected danger zone temperatures the IPCC tells us would be catastrophic. Emision levels would hardly have compared and yet the polar ice caps didn't completely melt and tidal waves didn't come and wipe out the planet based on the higher temperatures.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_warm_period"]Medieval Warm Period - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png/275px-2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/c/c1/2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png/275px-2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png[/ame]

Looking at these patterns over a longer period of time is something most people aren't interested in doing. Because of this, the UN can continue holding humanity to account based on it's 'evidence' as the basis to impose green taxes on stuff like harmful gases in animal feces, decaying organic matter etc.

[yt]rTgd7KO8kF8[/yt]

heres the answer to our climate change

isnt it true (from what ive read in the paper/ saw on tv) that if the polar icecaps melt, there'll only be a global rise of 100 ft water??

ps. where the fook's me avatar gone??? :angry:

How come a large portion of the polar ice caps melt every year in the summer. Yet, we do not see a seasonal change in sea level?