Speed Painting - Scarlett Johansson Check this out.. the guy is a god on Photoshop!! Or is it Painter???? Either way its fucking [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y14g50q4hQ0]cool[/ame]
can't believe anyone would spend so many hours fucking about on photoshop when he could have drawn the same thing in an hour with some pencils.
i think this sums up the amount of piss ripping I would like to do. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBLfufy4Pu4&mode=related&search=]pissripping[/ame] I totally agree, if he can draw like that on photoshop he shouldnt be wasting his time.
wow, must have some patience to do that... a real drawing/painting and a computer graphic are pretty different though even if you scanned it in it wouldn't have the same effect.
he is taking the piss out of the photoshop one. I find that amusing. like forks said why spend hours pissing about on photoshop when if he is that good of an artist, it could look the same or better on paper? If it was done with a tablet, its most likely copying, which is even more rediculous in my opinion. show a 5 year old how to trace using the tablet, and how to colour in on photoshop I bet they would do a better job.
I didn't understand the 'speed' bit. Are we meant to believe that piece of film was showing what he was doing in real time? Surely no one believes that?
digital is the future, i very much doubt if theyve been done with a tablet theyve been traced! you can get a much cleaner andmore realistic finish in ps than on paper anyhow. a lot of digital artists sketch there work onto paper first then colour them in digitally. no harm in that
Well I work in photoshop too but I use it where it saves time or does things I couldn't do on paper. There is nothing wrong with digital art, I agree it is the way of the future, but doing work like the one gowansy shows is just a bit pointless IMO. When photography was first invented artists of the time used cameras to make work which looked as much like the paintings of the time as possible. They were'nt able to imagine that art in a different medium could look different and still be good art. Later ,when more imaginative artists used photography on it's own terms, a new art form called photography came into being which had little to do with aping painting. The phenomenal opportunities that programmes like photoshop offer to creative individuals is immense. That is why I feel that someone with talent (as both the examples linked to on this thread have) should not spend their time trying to ape oil paintings.
What's the problem here? They look class, everyone draws on paper, he's being different. I'm sure he can draw just as good on paper as he can on there. The bloke has talent.
The John Locke one is class. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nayw1-det4o&mode=related&search="]YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
Absolutely amazing, clearly didnt take him 7 minutes, but still class. if you saying why didnt he do it on paper, thats like saying why do djs use ableton instead of just turntables. he can make a mistake and change it. this is my favourite piss take tho! [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVjEKFZ_bsQ&mode=related&search="]YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
