shud vs mixes... shud vs' tunes be beaten with a shitty stick and fed to the bears?... i hate em... they ruin perfectly gud tunes by sticking sum shit vocal that barley fits. :evil: example: shan on sat... random hard house with even more random acapellas.. gud thing i was fooked lets say that :spangled:
Re: shud vs mixes... no1 gives a shit abuot your opinion 'mate' most people on this board have openly admitted they dont care for your or my opinion so why do you bother?
Re: Re: shud vs mixes... its summit to do innit. plus i dont care if people dont listen to what i say.... there entitled to there own opinion.. its just the wrong one.
on the whole i think they are a big pile of wank! I ve yet to hear one that really impresses me, but when i was 18, i did think they were quite cool! lol... Nah ban em i say, they re made by spotty geeks wi too much time on they re hands!
some of them work though...shan is the king of puttin accapellas on tunes...he always plays the prime mover mix of shakedowns at night and the version of the dawn he plays wif kings of tomorrow on is well good
that the one we heard @ revels??? the one where he lays kings of tomorro - finally acapella over tdv - the dawn?? WELL GOOD!!!!!!!!
thats the one bri! tis ace init i fink hard house can get away wif the odd accapella here and there cos its fun and not all serious
If done well their fucking class... elctroclash/nuwave/breaks/whatever often uses 80's pop shite and makes it sound wikkid - hard house is the same... granted some sound shite (specially when they're played over a trancey breakdown) but some can sound fucking amazing.... take our very own ste's the dawn v another one bites the dust.... I reckon most will of heard that by now and its fucking excellent.. It just has to be done well and not every 5 minutes. not that big a fan of shan though...
