New Offside rule

Discussion in 'Sport' started by Dez, Feb 11, 2004.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

  1. Dez

    Dez Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    2,470
    Likes Received:
    2
    New Offside rule

    is really stupid.
    Bolton were totally exploiting it last night. Everytime they had a free kick on about the halfway line they put 2 players right near the goal who then ran back as the kick was taken. even though they are 'offside' as soon as someone else touches it they become onside
  2. 1615634792921.png
  3. Nat

    Nat Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,014
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Down bloody South
    How long do you think it will last?
  4. Jimmy

    Jimmy Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    24,757
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Bedlington
    this rule is daft like, I hope it dosent last too long:)
  5. JockB

    JockB Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    7,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Newcastle
    When did it change from "if you were interfering with play or came back into play you would be judged offside" to this???

    I had an argument at lunch time with the plamf I sit beside about this :lol:
  6. Smog

    Smog Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2003
    Messages:
    10,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the rule is terrible. I agree with favouring attacking play, but this will not benifit football as a whole... it is glorified goal hanging, and everyone used to hate the 'goal hangers' in PE football. If they are looking to promote more attacking football then surely a bit of common sense on the linesmans part is the best option... if the call is minimal, favour the attacker = more goals :up:
  7. Nat

    Nat Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,014
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Down bloody South
    actually i reckon ity will stand all they have done is dephine a rule!!
  8. Dez

    Dez Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    2,470
    Likes Received:
    2
    A few weeks ago. FIFA trying to clarify the rule but just making it much worse
  9. TheSpence

    TheSpence Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2002
    Messages:
    18,726
    Likes Received:
    112
    Fifa has claimed its latest guidelines on the offside law are nothing new and are understood by players and managers.
    Despite growing calls to change the law, Fifa has stood firm and says its objective of promoting attacking football is now being achieved.

    A Fifa spokesman told BBC sport: "There seems to be misunderstanding in the media, but not among those in the game.

    "Goals and attacking opponents were being cancelled out by players being offside but not interfering with play."

    The law now states that a player in an offside position is only penalised if involved in interfering with play, interfering with an opponent or gaining an advantage by being in that position.

    However, the level of confusion as to what determines "active" play seems to be rising at an alarming rate and Bolton boss Sam Allardyce is among those unhappy with Fifa's guidelines.

    After his side's draw with Leicester on Tuesday, in which Bolton pushed the offside law to the limit, Allardyce said: "I don't think it adds anything to the game whatsoever other than confusion.

    "It's not the referees fault, it's Fifa's. I think they have got it wrong."

    But Fifa maintains "this is not a new rule, it is a clarification of the interpretation of a rule".

    And Fifa insisted: "Further details of the rule were given to ensure the laws of the game are respected, and to protect the attacking players."

    That may be the case, but Allardyce is one voice in a growing chorus of dissenters.

    Allardyce said he hopes Fifa "will change it (the guidelines) back" but that appears unlikely.

    Particularly while Fifa refuses to admit there is a problem, and the goals count continues to rise.
  10. JockB

    JockB Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    7,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Woman have no chance understanding this one :lol: :lol:
  11. Play

    Play Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,969
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    house
    They had no chance with the first one!!!
  12. Dez

    Dez Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    2,470
    Likes Received:
    2
    Aren't now you only classed as interfering if you touch the ball
  13. Amyblah

    Amyblah Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2001
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Consett
    :evil: :evil:

    Hogg was well impressed with me cos I explained it better than he could. He said most women he knows can't get to grips with the old one though :lol:

    I think it's just cos they can't be arsed to think about it tbh. Once you think about it it's easy
  14. iamian

    iamian Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,916
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Auckland, NZ
    yeah what if you're in the goalkeepers line of sight?

    surely then you're interfering with play?
  15. Dez

    Dez Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    2,470
    Likes Received:
    2
    Thats what happened with Ian Walker
  16. loopyloosy

    loopyloosy Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    5,026
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    location, location.
    you mean girly women right?i understand and im blonde as well!!:D
  17. JockB

    JockB Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    7,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Newcastle
    I didn't think any of the girls even read this forum, Ruth exscluded.

    :lol:

Share This Page