How far can 'Terminator Robots' be off reality?

Discussion in 'Technology' started by Rob, Dec 18, 2003.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

  1. Rob

    Rob Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,757
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Sancho Panza
  2. 1615634792921.png
  3. SeniorChem Si

    SeniorChem Si Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    7,825
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Getting it on
    bear in mind that civilian technology is usually about 10yrs behind military technology :eek:

    you have 15 seconds to comply......

    you have 10 seconds to comply.....
  4. Rob

    Rob Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,757
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Sancho Panza

    It's serious shit innit.


    We are a long way off having AI (self controlling) robots like that but I can see the US having call centres full of operators controlling an army of those bots for 'peace keeping' duties.

    It'll be like playing couter strike. :D
  5. batfink

    batfink Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2001
    Messages:
    4,565
    Likes Received:
    1
    :eek:
  6. trance_fan

    trance_fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,079
    Likes Received:
    0
    impressive stuff!!

    self controlling maybe, but i doubt a robot could ever produce an original idea, like write a poem of the top of its head without prior programming.

    THAT would be impressive :p
  7. spud693

    spud693 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,478
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Out in the sticks cool as fukk gang! :)
    they rule... i want one :love:
  8. ussrpatriot

    ussrpatriot Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2003
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Newcastle
    When we write a poem off " the top of our head", the idea does just come from assembled and interpreted inputs to our brains, so the only difference from a computer's reasoning is in a) complexity - humans are much more complex aka intelligent thinkers at the moment, and b) in that human thought uses chaotic processes to introduce unpredictability, ie they are not discrete state machines (practically speaking), they are analogue.

    So its more than possible that you will be impressed by such feats within your lifetime. Remember in 1950, the first computer that could add faster than human thought was invented; this was previously widely considered impossible to achieve. It was the size of a warehouse, and ran at 96 hz i think. :)
  9. SeniorChem Si

    SeniorChem Si Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    7,825
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Getting it on
    all true but computer "intelligence" is totally different from human intelligence. Computers aren't "intelligent" at all, they're just very very fast but incapable of original thought, lateral thinking, reasoning etc. Far as I know there is no computer on earth that does anything more than simply follow coded instructions, so true machine intelligence is still a way off yet


    .... far as I know
  10. ussrpatriot

    ussrpatriot Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2003
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Newcastle
    What I was trying to say, was that Humans are not "intelligent" in the sense that they are original, they just intruduce a radom element into processing (neural net computing), possible combined with a quantum mechanism, to allow ideas to evolve like a species.

    That is to say, they are still mechanical in nature and there is no fundamental reason stopping machines from achieving or surpassing our level of sentience.
  11. trance_fan

    trance_fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,079
    Likes Received:
    0
    did you say Sentience?

    bosh!
  12. blur

    blur Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    heaton
    read some ian.m banks books. Then you'll undestand what "sentience" means :rolleyes:

Share This Page