Can Sum1 Please Explain

Discussion in 'Photos' started by JIMI, May 17, 2006.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

  1. JIMI

    JIMI Not an Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,422
    Likes Received:
    37
    Location:
    either on a messenger of death or a naval base
    Can Sum1 Please Explain

    please explain how this has happen!

    also i aint been online in ages so dont be all philisofical about the pic

    Attached Files:

    • jimi.jpg
      jimi.jpg
      File size:
      35.2 KB
      Views:
      537
  2. 1615634792921.png
  3. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because it's dark, the camera needs to have the shutter open for longer to get enough light to get a correctly exposed picture.

    If you move whilst the shutter is open, it will record everything in that time.

    Therefore, you can see a background superimposed on youreself, as you moved whilst the shutter was open.

    I'm guessing this was taken without a flash, which shortens the shutter speed.
  4. Alexander

    Alexander Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    no thats just two photos mixed together it happens sometimes
  5. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
  6. Gav Freaky Dancing

    Gav Freaky Dancing Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    0
    when you're fucked the camera records everything just as you are seeing it... the person taking this was on ket, therefore the picture looks like that... simple innit:wink:
  7. Gav Freaky Dancing

    Gav Freaky Dancing Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    0
    this is also the reason all the girls in mixmag look so good... mixmag photographers and mdma / coke er allegedly
  8. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can imagine my surprise at being called a 'right goon' by alex the other day.
  9. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    I can imagine you might be surprised by Alex making you look a tit for trying to be clever giving a long-winded incorrect answer. And worse still the correct answer was summed up by AvBoy in one line :lol:
  10. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    I run a photography business as a little sideline :D

    I have yet to encounter this mysterious photo-merging, and especially yet to encounter alex being right about something.
  11. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Dunno if it's possible with digital photos, but it used to happen with 'old-fashioned' photos all the time. Just means they fucked up when developing the film.
  12. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    If this is a scanned film photo, I will sit down :oops:
  13. French William

    French William _________________

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Well either way, you were still wrong above. It's obviously two photos.
  14. Alexander

    Alexander Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    it obvious its two photos if you look carefully, theres two people holding each other in one, and just one person in the other.
  15. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the two people in front had moved, but they guy beyhind had stayed still you could get a pic like that I think. There's no background from the second pic? :confused:
  16. graham

    graham Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    7,724
    Likes Received:
    31
    Location:
    aye.
    Can Sum1 Please Explain......

    Why this is in the events forum???? :spangled: :lol:
  17. naughtybut nice

    naughtybut nice None

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Re: Can Sum1 Please Explain

    Was it a digital camera or with a film?
    What could have happened is that it got to the end of the film and instead of taking it out it went over the film again so two pics are projected on top of eachother.
    Then again I just made that up, so it's probs bullshit! :lol:
  18. Alexander

    Alexander Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    ahh but seeing as your a photo expert you should know that if it was two photos, there would be trials connecting the two photos together. think you need to learn a bit more about photography before you can ammount to my knowledge on the subject.:king:
  19. andy_rocks

    andy_rocks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not if they moved very quickly ;) :D

    Do we know if its a digital pic yet?

    If it is, you have still to explain how the film could run out in a digital camera to convince me :D
  20. Alexander

    Alexander Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    even if they moved very quickly there would still be trails


    course its not a digital camera, that doesn't happen with digital cameras.
  21. naughtybut nice

    naughtybut nice None

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    642
    Likes Received:
    0
    To me it looks like 2 pics on the same bit of film, quite straight forward.
    Used to happen to me all the time with them disposable cameras.

Share This Page